Backtest Evidence Review
You send one strategy (trade-results spreadsheet or CSV export + rules). I send back a short report on whether the evidence holds up: costs, out-of-sample data not used to tune the strategy, comparison with randomized results, sample size. Not whether to trade it.
Ask first opens a fit-check email draft — not a purchase. Stripe-hosted checkout. After I verify payment, I email intake + a private Proton Drive folder for uploads.
I run a personal research lab where I pre-register hypotheses before testing them. Six experiments so far (H001–H006). None passed my own gates for live capital — including H001, which looked fine on simulated out-of-sample profit until the randomized-results comparison and trade count failed.
H001 verdict: insufficient evidence (simulated PnL +113.92 on 1,000 start, randomized comparison failed, 13 trades < 15 required)
One strategy. A trade-results spreadsheet or CSV export. Written rules and cost assumptions. Optional: a superficial review of up to 200 lines, without running the code.
No API keys. No “make this profitable” requests. No signals.
Xavier Gisbert Blanquer — independent methodology reviewer, Spain. I pre-register hypotheses and walk-forward splits before running out-of-sample tests; I apply a comparison with randomized results (null test) and minimum trade-count gates before treating any curve as evidence. The H001 sample above is one of six lab runs — all failed those gates.
This is methodology feedback on materials you provide. Not investment advice. Past backtests do not predict future results. You remain responsible for trading and compliance decisions. Legal · Privacy · Terms